Hi Linc 24. I’m quite familiar what to look for. And I have owned nothing but Ford, Mercury and Lincoln vehicles, since my first new car in 1976 (not that past vehicle ownership proves either of us wrong or right).As I mentioned the stamping is directly on the wheel. I have many Ford vehicles and I checked all my wheels and the all have the offsets imprinted on everyone in you know what you are looking for. Every model has different offset specs. I mentioned all the models on the C2 platform but I did not state that all the offsetts were the same. My vehicle came with the 21" rims. a vehicle with the 20 or 22inch rim nay be slight difference say 65 offset or 60. I dont know there numbers specifically. I chose to go with the 19 inch for my Winter rim as that is what Ford has created with the specific tire size previously mentioned. The 24 Nautilus has a unique hub backspacing and this is why the enginnering chose the corresponding offset.
Hi swindler. Thanks for the photos!This does not list the bore, but here are 19" 2024 Nautilus wheels for sale with the rear stamping.
View attachment 21928View attachment 21929View attachment 21930
To be clear, @bbf2530, I wasn't disputing whether or not there were stampings. I was just confirming that the offset agrees with other listings I've seen (and noted). I think the most curious aspect is the incongruity of the bore size, which again, I've often seen listed as 63.4, but @Linc 24 appears to have discovered it's not???Hi swindler. Thanks for the photos!
Just to clarify though: I did not state there are no “stampings” on the backs of wheels. Yes, there are usually some combination of part numbers, engineering numbers etc.
Then sometimes or even often there may/will be various wheel specs such as some or none of offset, width etc.
(i.e. the “ET60”, denoting offset as you stated in your earlier reply).
What I as stating is that specs are not always stamped on the back of wheels, as earlier replies could be read to infer.
Sorry for any confusion, and good luck.![]()
Hi swindler. Yes, I understand. I was not sure if you misunderstood my intent, so was only clarifying.To be clear, @bbf2530, I wasn't disputing whether or not there were stampings. I was just confirming that the offset agrees with other listings I've seen (and noted). I think the most curious aspect is the incongruity of the bore size, which again, I've often seen listed as 63.4, but @Linc 24 appears to have discovered it's not???
Not so. Every Nautilus comes with an 18 inch. The spare tire.Surprised that Lincoln is advising 18 inch, for snows on the Nautilus. As the smallest tire it comes with as standard is 19 inch.
I think that is because Lincoln is suggesting the 18 inch tires for this car. Same as the spare we all have. This was stated early in this thread by Linc 24 I believe.I noticed NONE of the tires mentioned in the Canada dealer list would be able in my tire size.
I was told the diameter of all the factory tires were the same...like 31 inches.Can’t answer that one. Someone else to chime in.
Is the accuracy affected by the fact some are built with 19s all the way to 22 for the jet package.
Kind of an interesting story. On one of our tracking products, we were using the GPS position results to calculate miles driven. We found that it matched the odometer to within 6-7%, which seemed rather poor. I had hoped for better.I was told the diameter of all the factory tires were the same...like 31 inches.