Open Letter to Lincoln - How I'd Improve the Corsair

Administrator

Lincoln Fanatic
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
3,043
Reaction score
363
Points
83
Location
Royal Palm Beach, Florida
Lincoln executives have been watching this community for years. They've also made improvements to their vehicles based upon what they've read here. They are listening to you.

This discussion will serve as a quick and easy way for Lincoln executives to gauge interest and help make decisions moving forward.

As a Corsair driver, you should state exactly what you'd like to see enhanced, added, and/or omitted from your Lincoln Corsair.

Any posts that don't stick to the subject matter will be moved elsewhere.
 
The Corsair is end of life after '25 to be replaced by an EV. I'd expect it to carry on untouched, especially after the '23 update, until it ceases production when the plant is retooled.

I'd like BlueCruise 1.3 or 1.4 though. Or at least some communication on what to expect update wise.
 
Lincoln executives have been watching this community for years. They've also made improvements to their vehicles based upon what they've read here. They are listening to you.

This discussion will serve as a quick and easy way for Lincoln executives to gauge interest and help make decisions moving forward.

As a Corsair driver, you should state exactly what you'd like to see enhanced, added, and/or omitted from your Lincoln Corsair.

Any posts that don't stick to the subject matter will be moved elsewhere.
I suggest a more up to date, comprehensive and more accessible set of user video instructions.
 
My biggest gripe with the PHEV is the lack of a true "Pure EV" mode. Currently, on the GT, "Pure EV" gets overridden by the computer in various situations that often make no sense. Leave that for some other mode. When I select "Pure EV", I mean it. Turning the ICE on for a few seconds or minutes is bad, very bad, for the engine. It's enough to make me avoid the PHEV even though I otherwise like it.
 
The center console lid is a hot mess. In such a small vehicle, the lid should open toward the passenger so the driver has full access to the console. The current configuration opening from the front is awkward. I'm constantly opening the console only to accidentally close it with my elbow while trying to access the contents.
 
Add the missing parts you left out !!! Engine cover, pieces to support rear quarter panels that are floppy. Subwoofer ! Hands free rear liftgate ! Whatever else you conveniently left out blaming the supply chain !
______________________________

Help support this site so it can continue supporting you!
 
Sales Manager recently told me Lincoln dropped plans for an all EV lineup, opting instead for the current mix of ICE and hybrids with no EVs.
This is what's in the new union contract. A sales manager said? Really? ;)


_storage_emulated_0_Android_data_com.adobe.reader_files_Pictures_Adobe Acrobat Exports_Ford-U...webp
 
This is what's in the new union contract. A sales manager said? Really? ;)
His family owns several dealerships & he lives next door to a relative of mine. So we talk occasionally. I asked what happened to the Lincoln All-EV lineup TV ads that were common a year or two ago. They proclaimed Lincoln would be 100% EV in a few years.

The union chart seems to mostly support the current status quo. There's a few new EVs listed for all of Ford/Lincoln. No indication on the chart of Lincoln going 100% EV.
 
Offer a FHEV vs. the PHEV. The PHEV cost is significantly more and the payback is years longer than the FHEV.
I wonder if you really understand the PHEV. I'm at 74.6 mpg at about 6000 miles, more than double that of my hybrid MKZ. It's the plain hybrid that's barely worth having.
 
Putting aside all the above, you can see with your own eyes the big demand for EVs two-three years ago has disappeared along with the Lincoln ads. Ford Lightening & Mach-E had waiting lists and sold for thousands over MSRP. Today, they can't give them away. That explains the disappearing act for a future all-EV Lincoln fleet.
______________________________

Help support this site so it can continue supporting you!
 
The center console lid is a hot mess. In such a small vehicle, the lid should open toward the passenger so the driver has full access to the console. The current configuration opening from the front is awkward. I'm constantly opening the console only to accidentally close it with my elbow while trying to access the contents.
Great observation. Seems like most other makes/models that I drive use the same configuration & they’re all a PITA.
 
I wonder if you really understand the PHEV. I'm at 74.6 mpg at about 6000 miles, more than double that of my hybrid MKZ. It's the plain hybrid that's barely worth having.
$1500 added cost for an FHEV vs $11,000 for a GT PHEV is a significant difference. Even at higher gas mileage for the PHEV it will take years to recoup the cost differential from an FHEV. I fully understand the PHEV as I currently am driving one.
 
$1500 added cost for an FHEV vs $11,000 for a GT PHEV is a significant difference. Even at higher gas mileage for the PHEV it will take years to recoup the cost differential from an FHEV. I fully understand the PHEV as I currently am driving one.
On what basis do you think a Corsair FHEV would be $9500 less than a PHEV.
its a certainty not. At best you’re comparing apples and oranges (packages) which has nothing to do with FHEV vs PHEV.

UPDATE
I see where you probably got your numbers (Nautalis versus Corsair base prices) but I don’t agree with your assumption. Corsair PHEV is not priced a la carte so you don’t know the PHEV price.
What we do know is the PHEV has a bigger battery that is probably most of Ford’s added cost so if they wanted a cheaper PHEV they could just offer smaller battery.
 
Last edited:
On what basis do you think a Corsair FHEV would be $9500 less than a PHEV.
its a certainty not. At best you’re comparing apples and oranges (packages) which has nothing to do with FHEV vs PHEV.
I’m going by pricing on the PHEV Corsair and Aviator. There is nearly $11,000 up charge for the PHEV vs the ICE. The FHEV Nautilus costs $1500 more. That’s where my calculations came from. The bigger battery pack in the PHEV comes at a much bigger cost. It will takes years to overcome that cost differential.

I do love my Corsair GT. I was an early adopter and got one of the first ones built. Driving around town in all electric mode is a bonus. I have almost 27,000 miles and am averaging over 51 MPG.
______________________________

Help support this site so it can continue supporting you!
 
$1500 added cost for an FHEV vs $11,000 for a GT PHEV is a significant difference. Even at higher gas mileage for the PHEV it will take years to recoup the cost differential from an FHEV. I fully understand the PHEV as I currently am driving one.
Driving one doesn’t mean you understand its use, and important to this thread, that you understand the FHEV/PHEV difference.

With electric rates trending up and gasoline down, you can't expect to ever recoup the cost difference unless a carbon tax is implemented. But that's not the reason for PHEV/EV; the main reason is environment. The PHEV potentially has dramatically lower CO2 footprint than the FHEV.
 
Driving one doesn’t mean you understand its use, and important to this thread, that you understand the FHEV/PHEV difference.

With electric rates trending up and gasoline down, you can't expect to ever recoup the cost difference unless a carbon tax is implemented. But that's not the reason for PHEV/EV; the main reason is environment. The PHEV potentially has dramatically lower CO2 footprint than the FHEV.
I completely understand their use. It’s why I got one. However, the cost IS a factor. It’s why Ford paused their EV deployments.

Battery and charging technologies are changing at a rapid pace. I think things will settle out in the next 3-4 years. I believe there will be a low cost battery, a midrange and a higher end that will complement the size and class of the vehicle.

In the meantime, offering FHEV across the board will also decrease the carbon foot print.
 
Most customers are happy when a product "over-achieves" on a requirement. This is not one of those cases. FMVSS No. 141, Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles requires vehicles to have an audible sound up to 18 MPH (it actually states 30 km/hr, apparently the US agency doesn't know that we use MPH has the US standard....). It does not require a stupid bonging noise for reverse. Not only did Ford add the bonging noise, they well exceeded the minimum volume for this "safety feature" and it works up to 25 MPH. Please don't over-achieve on something that is this annoying. It makes no sense that they have made our EVs louder than about 90% of the ICE only vehicles at these speeds. Give me a way to set this back to the minimum required volume.

When I unlock the rear hatch to load groceries, why do I have to manually unlock the doors so my family can get into the vehicle? I have the car set to unlock all doors. If I open any of the side doors, it unlocks all of the doors. But, somehow the hatch is not treated as a door in this logic.

The easy exit seating option is useless for anyone under 5'7". It moves the seat back too far to allow the driver to reach the brake pedal to start the vehicle.

The Revel audio system is terrible. There is no bass to this system. The front sound stage is so awful that the best sound for the driver is obtained when it is set to "on-stage". This setting makes no sense and still lacks any low frequency punch. This is with the subwoofer. No subwoofer delete here.

The options for driver information is too limited. The temperature gauge gives very little info. In a world of computerized vehicles, a driver should be able to see the actual temperature of the coolant, actual temperature of oil, actual oil pressure, etc. A PHEV minivan will provide this information, why not the Corsair? Additional information about the state of charge on the traction battery would also be desirable.

The 3.3kW/hr on-board charger is an insult. The vehicle would provide much better charge rates with the more common 6.6kW/hr charger. Even Toyota offers this as an upgrade. Stellantis provides it as the standard charger.

The cargo cover should be a standard item. If it has to be special ordered, the sales staff should be more knowledgeable. Why would a customer assume that they need to ask about this? And then, after delivery, even Lincoln Concierge couldn't figure out how to order one.

The trailer harness connector is non-standard. Many trailer wiring harnesses will not plug into this 4 Pin connector without using an extension that does not have a sheath covering the pins.

The seatbelt reminder is relentless. Its one thing to not have mercy on people with long driveways and force them to put the seatbelt on or go insane with the noise after they pick-up the mail. BUT, when all passengers have buckled their belts, why should the driver have to select OK to have this display cleared from the dash?

I could go on, but in all honesty, I am not sure if this is intended to be a free therapy session or if there is some hope that Ford might actually read this thread.
 
The 3.3kW/hr on-board charger is an insult. The vehicle would provide much better charge rates with the more common 6.6kW/hr charger. Even Toyota offers this as an upgrade. Stellantis provides it as the standard charger.
I second this one, there are times that I use up the battery earlier in the day, and have to wait over 3 hours to run another errand. Visiting a location with a free public charger is almost useless to use unless you stay there for multiple hours too. Definitely not work a paid charger station, tying it up for hours for less then 30 miles...

I would pay extra for the 6Kw/hr option.

The cargo cover should be a standard item. If it has to be special ordered, the sales staff should be more knowledgeable. Why would a customer assume that they need to ask about this? And then, after delivery, even Lincoln Concierge couldn't figure out how to order one.
There should be a retractable easily removable cargo cover available, if not standard for a car of this class. Think Toyota Venza cover, easily hide things, but can be removed and placed in the cargo area for items that are too tall to fit under it. Try and stash that solid Lincoln cover in the car when you have tall items back there!

I realize this isn't a full EV, but having more battery range would be very useful, a few other PHEV vehicles are starting to push 50 miles on a charge these days. I would pay extra for this added range.
 
Back
Top