Lincoln Nautilus 2023 Reverse Lights Blinking

SonnyXO

New member
Joined
Jan 17, 2024
Messages
11
Reaction score
8
Points
3
My Lincoln
2023 Nautilus
Hello Everyone, I hope you're all doing well. I recently noticed an unusual behavior with my Lincoln Nautilus 2023, and I wanted to check if anyone else has experienced something similar.

When I engage the reverse gear, I observe that the reverse light blinks, It's not hyperblinking; instead, it blinks, waits a second or so, and then blinks again, somewhat resembling the emergency lights on a building. It's a bit annoying, especially considering that my Nautilus has only covered 300 kilometers.

Has anyone encountered a situation like this before? If so, I would appreciate any insights or advice on what might be causing this issue.

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Update: The issue resolved on its own; we didn't take any action. We simply used it for a day, and that was it. If it happens again, then it's time to return it to the dealership for warranty service.
 
I looked at the schematic. Appears that the BCM outputs voltage (via an FET) to the reverse light. It looks like a straight run to the LED, a few connectors & splices along the way until it connects to the tailgate harness.
You said the issue went away after using for a day. I wonder if the BCM FET output was weak due to an undercharged battery. A possibility since all is well now!
If you want the schematic details, let me know!
______________________________

Help support this site so it can continue supporting you!
 
Sometimes…..repeat sometimes as per the vehicles programming the lights will flicker to let you know the battery is getting low. Vehicles on our showroom do that.
But only the Reverse Lights? That seems odd to me... Wouldn't it be a better approach to display a notification of Low Battery Level on the cluster? Maybe a bug that Lincoln overlooked by accident.
 
They are LEDs and not individual bulbs. May be a software quirk in there somewhere.
Possibly... as it hasn't happened again since then, I hope this was just a one-time occurrence.
 
But only the Reverse Lights? That seems odd to me... Wouldn't it be a better approach to display a notification of Low Battery Level on the cluster? Maybe a bug that Lincoln overlooked by accident.
All vehicles these days have energy/management conservation programs. All vehicles have draws on the battery even when shut down & sitting. The longer a vehicle sits, the longer the drain. Manufacturers have built in safeguards to insure a battery has enough power to start a vehicle when battery reserve reaches a critical level. This is the level needed to have enough voltage/cranking amps to start a vehicle. The longer a battery sits, the more it loses efficiency. The longer a battery sits, the more it sulfates. This is why trickle chargers are so important in combating sulfation.
On many (I would say most) vehicles started on a weak battery, have programming to devote more to initial battery charging by limiting certain functions until the battery reaches a healthy state of charge. This might be the case on our Lincolns.

Regarding the backup lamp we are discussing, this setup (the output) has a long journey from BCM to tailgate LED. The BCM FET for the reverse light would require a low voltage signal (program input) to switch on a high voltage output to enable & deliver sufficient forward voltage needed to turn on the Rev. light LED)
In your case, you noticed the backup lamp flickering. It could be a few things, but what Kolectr (I believe) & I are alluding to is:
1). Possible battery program management to BCM FET controlling BCM output to Rev. light shutdown due to monitoring a low battery state of charge condition. This would be a built in safeguard.
2). The BCM might be delivering the (low voltage) input signal to the Rev. light FET, but the FET output (battery voltage) might be too weak to sustain the Rev. light LED from operating (low forward voltage to LED is to low).
3). Intermittent connection somewhere along the path from BCM output to LED.

Truth is, most all sitting vehicles upon start up are starting with some degree of battery inefficiency under 100%. The longer they sit, the more efficiency is lost, (state of charge).
If manufacturers enabled a low battery indication to let you know a low state of charge is present in a standing (sitting) battery, that would wreak havoc in the industry! Imagine everyone flooding dealer service depts. on a Monday morning stating battery light was on before they started their vehicle, but went away after starting!

Instead of alarming the user to a low state of charge before start up, programs manage battery condition before & after the vehicle is running, monitoring state of charge, and replenishing the battery after start up, ensuring all is well! The user is unaware of this seamless operation. Not an oversight at all.
In the old days, autos had battery voltage gauges or AMP gauges to let you know battery condition. Today, computers do all that for you!
______________________________

Help support this site so it can continue supporting you!
 
OK..a bit of irony here!
Have not used our 2023 Nautilus in 15 days. Every day of those 15 were temps at or below 32F. (New York lower Hudson region) during daytime. Evening temps averaged about 24F during tose 15 days of the vehicle sitting untouched. After posting above message I went out to put a charger on it. Upon coming into proximity, no welcome lights at all. I used the FOB to unlock the doors, no problem, doors unlocked, got a nice horn chirp & mirror lamps flashed for visual confirmation as usual. I open the door....pitch black! No interior lights, no door lights, no info screen illumination. The dash screen had a soft fuzzy gray back light, that is it.
I am sorry I did not attempt to start it to verify system was in energy management mode, but I knew it would be low, and am confident it was doing what it should. I hooked up the maintenance charger to the battery & left all be. I checked about 5 hours later. Observing from my house window looking out to the driveway. With a 4 amp charger hooked up, the charger indicators were at to 75-80% of full charge.

Folks with EV vehicles had to wait it out for one of the 4 charging stations at the nearest available EV go station. First time I had seen them all occupied around the clock these past few weeks during this recent freeze!
 
In you part of the country, I Seriously can't see people buying electric cars!! EV batteries just don't preform in cold weather !! It's a proven fact!! Until a better battery technology is provided ICE tech is going to preform better. I truly feel sorry for the people that get sucked into the line that Is's better in cold country, only to find out that it's not as advertised. I'm in SoCal & i still prefer a ICE over a EV . Just too many problems for charging .
 
Back
Top